War Brings Peace

First M . Last Name prof s Name Class and Number 7 February 2007 Can struggle Bring Peace ? War is considered as a particular subsection of a specific philosophy , with Carl von Clausewitz being considered as the lone(prenominal) philosopher of war stated in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . It also says that it refers to , a phenomenon which occurs only between political communities or certain political pressure groups , de pieced terrorist organizations , might also be considered political communities in that they be associations of race with a political purpose (Stanford ,War , 2005 . On the other hand , cessation is the pursuit of justice with opposite methods of human diversity and who seek wild pansy be more or less responsible for social changes in visionary ways , while the proponents of war are considered to be foreshorten minded with one thing in mind to win something they want , using whatever methods they need to accomplish this . Religion has bee n blamed as the cause of many wars , yet they considered themselves to be an advocacy for non-violence . A root of conflict ,religion is also a philosophy and practitioner of ataraxis . unlike in itself , this explains the conflicting views bringing war into existence .Not tout ensemble wars are caused by opposing religious views , but the majority of them are . Jenny Teichman wrote in The Philosophy of War and Peace that Aggressive wars meet often been waged for religious reasons and still are today (Teichman , 2002 , pg . 2 . harmonize to Alexander Mosley in Philosophy of War , man cannot stop war it is his nature to wage war which backs my theory that war is the product of man s ideas and hence is a product of choice . We fight for cessation through war , and war continues on until peace comes into beingthese are contradictory statements .Peace found through war is not peace , only a win-win situation , or a give-in situation at the cost of lives , money , and and power w in Man chooses war , and by this is meant that individually individualist participant chooses war (or has to choose differently , if war is thrust upon him through invasion or conscription Mosley also states that , The individual is a volitional being , whose cognition is free to use and take aim and in group activity such as a troth , each individual must contribute his thought and effort even out if only accepting the orders of others (Mosley , pg . 39 . Does this refer to the desire for peace scarce . It refers to the fact many are at war through the desires of others for subterranean gain that has nothing to do with achieving peace . There is nothing defile with different views they are only different ,with each individual thought their viewpoint is the mitigate one -unfortunately , many feel their way is correct for absolutely everyone with everyone else wrong or evil . To sum it up , how each one goes about getting their way is what sets the scene for war or peace one may peacefully go about it with diplomatic and peaceful ways , such as