Adolescence and Moral Development Essay

Two major reasons exist for studying virtuous development during adolescence. First, cognitive changes that occur during adolescence be related to honourable development. Formal operational thinking allows the adolescent to transform the social environment in new and different ways. Second, because adolescents be sufficient of devising new and idealistic social orders to which all are expect to conform, we may view them as chaste philosophers.A number of researchers hire noted other changes in deterrent example development that point to the splendour of adolescence as a transition stage in honorable development. hostile pincerren, the adolescent is concerned with what is right as opposed to what is wrong. Also, adolescents become to a greater extent preoccupied with personal and social moral codes. As they gain the force to understand alternative points of view, they see that the moral codes are relative, not absolute. The to a higher place changes result in some con flict mingled with moral demand and moral thinking during adolescence.Early writing in the area of moral development was left to philosophers, who evolved three major doctrines of holiness, each of which is represented in contemporary psychological theorizing. The doctrine of the original sin assumed that maternal intervention was necessary to save the childs soul. Current-day vestiges of this viewpoint may be found in theories of personality structure and the development of the conscience, or superego, which argue that the child internalizes parental standards of right and wrong.See more diligence essayThe doctrine of innate purity argued that the child is basically moral, or pure, and that society, especially bounteouss, are dismaying influences. This view is represented in the theorizing of Piaget, who argues that morality develops from the acquisition of autonomy emerging from the need to get along with peers. moralistic thinking develops through peer-to-peer interaction s that lead to an understanding of rules, according to Piaget. He also considers that parents do not allow autonomous thinking to develop because parent-child relationships are basically heteronomous, that is, the child is ruled by the parents. Therefore, the parents retard moral development.The travel philosophic doctrine is the tabula rasa notion, which assumes that the child is neither innately pure nor corrupt but the product of environmental influences. The current-day representatives of this position are the learning theorists, who believe that development is the result of reinforcement and imitationmechanisms. In addition to these differing philosophical and theoretical views regarding the origin of morality, we must keep in mind the distinctions between three concepts systems of morality, moral behavior and moral grapheme. Systems of morality are demonstrate in the rules that guide social and interpersonal behavior. That includes rules that are written subjugate and th ose that are not. This broad definition includes all types of social behaviors, not notwithstanding those we consider moral behavior.Moral behaviors are those behaviors that are consistent with rules of morality. alike moral systems, moral behaviors include social behaviors of all types. This definition of moral behavior also includes behavior contrary to that expressed in moral code. Immoral behavior is simply a subclass of moral behavior.Moral denotation is a much more difficult concept to define. It is mostly exhausting to define due to the fact it involves an individuals motives for behaving in a particular way. The basic problem in delimit moral character is to determine those personality dimensions that determine it and vary as a run away of it. Moral knowledge , socialization, empathy, autonomy, and moral judgement are the major concepts defining moral character.In order to have successful peer and adult relationships, the adolescent must learn the rules of the society and act in conformity to these rules. Individuals who successfully master these tasks are said to possess moral character. Among psychologists, the literature of Freud and Piaget have had the greatest impact on research in moral development. Following their early works, there was little written about moral development. In the last two or three decades, there has been gigantic research and theorizing about the process underlying moral development.According to the principles of psychoanalytical theory, morality is part of the individuals conscience, or superego. The acquisition of morality is explained by the information of the superego, which results from resolution of the Oedipal complex and identification with the same-sex parent. Society ensures its survival of the fittest through this identification process by imposing its cultural standards, as represented by the parents behaviors, attitudes, aspirations, on the individual. Although the exact basis is unclear, Freuds theorizi ng has worked up considerable research into the effects of parental behavior on the childs moral development. The major research concerns have centered on moral character , the consistency of moral behavior across situations, and the consumption of parental disciplinary techniques in shaping moral behavior.