Organisations and behaviour Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Organisations and demeanour - Case Study Example, democracy, and laissez-faire as proposed by behavioral theorists1, however, the different leadership directions are currently considered to be transformational, transactional, or charismatic. Autocratic or authoritarian leadership style bestows all the decision-making powers whole on the leader, and motivation is achieved through rewards or punishments. However, for both at Egg and Taylor Woodrows workforce, this type of leadership whitethorn impact negatively on motivation of employees. Considering that the two companies both put a lot of ferocity on employee involvement, autocratic style leadership may not foster effectual communication, a puppet highly and considerably associated with effective implementation of change.Democratic or participative leadership allows employees to get actively involve in decision-making processes by developing plans aimed at helping employees evaluate their performance. This form of leadership w ill particularly impact positively in regard to workforce motivation at Taylor Woodrow given that they already deplete a working Performance and Development Review in place. Moreover, participative leadership permits establishment of goals by the workforce, promotes development on the job and promotions, and recognizes achievement. Therefore, during change implementation, participative or democratic leadership facilitates employee motivation, which in effect leads to improved placement performance and profitability.At Egg, democratic or participative leadership proves to be the most effective leadership style since the company puts a lot of emphasis on employee-management relationship, allowing employees to get involved in planning, performing, and achieving for themselves and the company in overall. Addition, the companys strategic approach toward employee is anchored on a know yourself, know your people design that puts not only the targets of the company itself but also those of the workforce at the core of its operations. With the